From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addleman v. King Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00286 (W.D. Wash. May. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00286

05-26-2023

LINCOLN LANE ADDLEMAN JR. et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN H. CHUN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Lincoln Addleman's “Rule 12 Motion Asking the Above-Entitled Court a Pure Question of Law Why I Must Risk My Life to Gain First Amendment Right to Access This Court?” Dkt. # 25. Addleman says that he bring this motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. Id. The motion is clearly not properly brought under that rule; before service of process on any defendant, it asks the Court to rule on the constitutionality of a Revised Code of Washington provision. See id. at 3 (“I am therefore asking the District Court to decide the constitutionality of RCW 4.24.550....”). Notably, on the date Addleman filed this motion, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs' complaint without prejudice. See Dkt. ## 25, 26. Plaintiffs have since filed an amended complaint. See Dkt. # 30. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion. Dkt. # 25.


Summaries of

Addleman v. King Cnty.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00286 (W.D. Wash. May. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Addleman v. King Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:LINCOLN LANE ADDLEMAN JR. et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 26, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00286 (W.D. Wash. May. 26, 2023)