(internal citations omitted). See also Addit, LLC v. Hengesbach, 341 So.3d 362, 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022); Osprey Health Care Ctr., LLC v. Pascazi by & through Outwater, 329 So.3d 177, 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021). A contract of adhesion is defined as a “standardized contract form offered to consumers of goods and services on essentially [a] ‘take it or leave it' basis without affording [the] consumer [a] realistic opportunity to bargain and under such conditions that [the] consumer cannot obtain [the] desired product or services except by acquiescing in the form contract.”
See generally Venn Therapeutics, LLC v. CAC Pharma Invs., LLC, 382 So.3d 6, 11 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 6, 2024) ("The standard of review we use when examining a trial court’s construction of an arbitration agreement as well as its application of the law to the facts is de novo." (citing Addit, LLC v. Hengesbach, 341 So. 3d 362, 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022))); Bell Transp., LLC v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 351 So. 3d 249, 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) ("We review issues of statutory interpretation de novo." (citing Lab. Corp. of Am v. Davis, 339 So. 3d 318, 323 (Fla. 2022))); Friedel v. Edwards, 327 So. 3d 1242, 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) ("We review a circuit court’s determination of. subject matter jurisdiction de novo."
The standard of review we use when examining a trial court’s construction of an ‘arbitration agreement as well as its application of the law to the facts is de novo. Addit, LLC v. Hengesbach, 341 So. 3d 362, 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (quoting Woebse v. Health Care & Ret. Corp. of Am., 977 So. 2d 630, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). B. Governing Arbitration Law