From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1925
129 S.E. 156 (N.C. 1925)

Opinion

(Filed 16 September, 1925.)

APPEAL by defendant from Cranmer, J., at April Term, 1925, of CURRITUCK.

W. L. Small for plaintiff.

Thompson Wilson for defendant.


Civil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury and killing of plaintiff's livestock and turkeys by defendant's engines and cars.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


The controversy on trial narrowed itself to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been heard and determined substantially in agreement with the law bearing on the subject, and that the validity of the trial should be sustained. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error.

His Honor properly ruled that the expression "any cattle or other livestock," as used in C. S., 3482, was not applicable to turkeys or other fowls. James v. R. R., 166 N.C. 572.

The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Addison v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1925
129 S.E. 156 (N.C. 1925)
Case details for

Addison v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:E. W. ADDISON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1925

Citations

129 S.E. 156 (N.C. 1925)
129 S.E. 156

Citing Cases

James v. R. R

HOKE and ALLEN, JJ., dissent. Cited: Enloe v. R.R., 179 N.C. 85; Addison v. R.R., 190 N.C. 849.…