From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. CNX Gas Company, LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 1:10CV00065 (W.D. Va. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10CV00065.

September 28, 2011


ORDER


This action by a lessor of coalbed methane gas was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 Supp. 2011) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) for findings and recommendations on motions to dismiss by the defendants. After briefing and argument by the parties, the magistrate judge issued her Amended Report and Recommendations. Addison v. CNX Gas Co., No. 1:10CV00065 (W.D. Va. May 13, 2011) (Sargent, J.). The plaintiff and the defendants filed timely Objections to the Report and Recommendations, which Objections have been briefed and argued before me.

Based upon my de novo review of the Objections, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. All of the Objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Amended Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 44) are fully ACCEPTED;

3. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by CNX Gas Company LLC (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART in accord with the Amended Report and Recommendations;

4. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Commonwealth Coal Company (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART in accord with the Amended Report and Recommendations; and

5. The Motion to Strike CNX Gas Company, LLC's Reply (ECF No. 57) is GRANTED, such reply being unauthorized.


Summaries of

Addison v. CNX Gas Company, LLC

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 1:10CV00065 (W.D. Va. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Addison v. CNX Gas Company, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DORIS BETTY ADDISON, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARILY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:10CV00065 (W.D. Va. Sep. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Latin Uno, Inc. v. Univision Commc'ns, Inc.

Instead, the findings are narrowly drawn to adjudicate only the questions of UPR as an indispensable party…