From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. Brawley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 27, 2024
2:23-cv-00191-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00191-JM

08-27-2024

NICHOLAS ADDISON ADC #162451 PLAINTIFF v. STANLEY BRAWLEY, D.D.S., EARU Infirmary, Wellpath Contractor, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Therefore, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's remaining Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Brawley, Rivers, and Hatchett are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, and Plaintiff's objections. (Doc. Nos. 44-45.) After reviewing the record de novo, this Court adopts the Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.


Summaries of

Addison v. Brawley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 27, 2024
2:23-cv-00191-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Addison v. Brawley

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS ADDISON ADC #162451 PLAINTIFF v. STANLEY BRAWLEY, D.D.S., EARU…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00191-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)