From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. Brawley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-00191-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00191-JM-JJV

03-13-2024

NICHOLAS ADDISON ADC #162451 PLAINTIFF v. STANLEY BRAWLEY, D.D.S., EARU Infirmary, Wellpath Contractor, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, and Plaintiff's objections. (Docs. 35, 37.) After reviewing the record de novo, this Court adopts the Partial Recommendation in its entirety as its findings in all respects.

Therefore, Defendant Culclager's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) is GRANTED, and all claims against her be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Medical Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff may proceed with the claims he exhausted against Defendants Rivers, Brawley, and Hatchett in grievances EAM-23-905 and EAM-23-1029 only. All other claims raised in the Complaint against Defendants Rivers, Brawley, and Hatchett are DISMISSED without prejudice. All claims against Defendant Palmer be DISMISSED without prejudice. And it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Addison v. Brawley

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-00191-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Addison v. Brawley

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS ADDISON ADC #162451 PLAINTIFF v. STANLEY BRAWLEY, D.D.S., EARU…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-00191-JM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)