Opinion
2:22-cv-00006-JAD-DJA
01-25-2022
SHERMAIN ADDISON-JONES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CARRIAGE CEMETERY SERVICES, INC., doing business as BUNKER EDEN VALE MEMORIAL PARK; DOES 1 through 100; and ROE CORPORATION 101 through 200, inclusive, Defendants.
BERNSTEIN & POISSON, Scott L. Poisson, Esq., Amber N. King, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff Shermain Addison-Jones EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP, Chad R. Fears, Esq., Alexandria L. Layton, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Carriage Cemetery Services, Inc.
BERNSTEIN & POISSON, Scott L. Poisson, Esq., Amber N. King, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff Shermain Addison-Jones
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP, Chad R. Fears, Esq., Alexandria L. Layton, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Carriage Cemetery Services, Inc.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND
Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge.
Plaintiff Shermain Addison-Jones ("Plaintiff Addison-Jones") and Defendant Carriag Cemetery Services, Inc. ("Defendant CCSI"), through their undersigned counsel of record, brin this STIPULATION and ORDER that this case be remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Cour Clark County, Nevada.
On January 3, 2022, Defendant CCSI removed this case to this Court based on diversit jurisdiction.
On January 14, 2022, Plaintiff Addison-Jones filed her Motion to Remand. In her motioi Plaintiff Addison-Jones "stipulated that she is not seeking damages in excess of $75,000," whic would divest this Court of jurisdiction.
On January 18, 2022, the Court granted the parties' stipulation to dismiss Carriage Services of Nevada, Inc.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
1. Plaintiff Addison-Jones stipulates that she is not seeking damages that would exceed $75,000.00, inclusive of all possible damages she could obtain in connection with this lawsuit;
2. Defendant CCSI agrees not to oppose Plaintiff Addison-Jones's Motion to Remand based on her stipulation that she does not seek damages in excess of $75,000.00;
3. The parties stipulate that the Motion to Remand [ECF No. 5] should be granted and the case remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada.
ORDER
BASED ON THE PARTIES' STIPULATION [9], which establishes that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this action, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND this case back to the Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 2, Case No. A-21-844392-C, and CLOSE THIS CASE.