Opinion
Civil No. 3:04-CV-1954-H.
October 24, 2005
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed August 23, 2005, regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Expert Designations; Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate's Recommendation, and supporting Appendix, filed September 7, 2005; Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Objections, filed September 9, 2005; and Plaintiff's Reply, filed September 14, 2005.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation de novo, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C). For the reasons found in the Magistrate's opinion, the recommendation of the Magistrate to deny Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Expert Designations should be, and it is hereby, ADOPTED. Plaintiff's's Objections are OVERRULED.
In light of the representations made in Plaintiff's timely filed Objections and appendix, Defendant's request for an award of attorney's fees is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.