From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addicks v. Sickel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 20, 2004
No. 02-03-218-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-03-218-CV

Delivered: May 20, 2004.

Appeal from the 78th District Court of Wichita County.

Roy E. Addicks, Jr., pro se.

John A. Sickel, pro se.

Barry E. Bigler, pro se.

PANEL D: WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J., and McCOY, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On April 1, 2004, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Addicks v. Sickel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 20, 2004
No. 02-03-218-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2004)
Case details for

Addicks v. Sickel

Case Details

Full title:ROY E. ADDICKS, JR., Appellant v. JOHN A. SICKEL AND BARRY E. BILGER…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 20, 2004

Citations

No. 02-03-218-CV (Tex. App. May. 20, 2004)