Summary
In Addicks v. Addicks, 266 Ill. 349, the testator gave to his two sons "to share alike the rent and income" of certain property "during their natural lives" and "after the death of my said sons, [naming them]," directed that the property be sold and the proceeds "be equally divided between all of my grandchildren, share and share alike."
Summary of this case from Kiesling v. WhiteOpinion
No. 09-04-123 CV
Submitted on November 17, 2004.
Opinion Delivered December 2, 2004.
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 03-01-00775-CV.
Affirmed.
Roy E. Addicks, Jr., pro se, Beaumont, TX for Appellant.
Jay M. Wright, Conroe, TX for appellee.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.
Roy E. Addicks, Jr. appeals the final decree in a suit for divorce. The appeal is submitted on the record of the indigence hearing because the trial court sustained contests filed by the district clerk and the court reporter. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1998).
The appeal was submitted without briefs because the appellant failed to file his brief by the October 1, 2004, due date. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(2). The appellant did not request an extension of time to file the brief. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(d). On October 27, 2004, we notified the parties that the appeal would be advanced without oral argument. See Tex.R.App.P. 39.9.
We have reviewed the record for fundamental error, and find none. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.