From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adcock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 10, 2003
861 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-2997.

Opinion filed December 10, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Harry M. Rapkin, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Gordon W. Adcock challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that it was facially insufficient. Our affirmance of the trial court's order is without prejudice to any right Adcock might have to file a facially sufficient motion raising the same claim within sixty days from the issuance of the mandate in this case.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Summaries of

Adcock v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 10, 2003
861 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Adcock v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gordon W. Adcock, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 10, 2003

Citations

861 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)