From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adcock v. Sattler's Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 6, 1954
283 App. Div. 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

January 6, 1954.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The only testimony in this record which tends to establish constructive notice of any dangerous condition of the floor was that given by the witness Walker who testified: "It was littered, it had debris and had banana peels on it." The proof shows that plaintiff slipped on a banana peel in the meat department. It does not appear how long plaintiff, her daughter, and Mrs. Walker, had been in the meat department before plaintiff fell. It does appear that they had been in other parts of the basement for some time before going to the meat department. While the court properly instructed the jury on the rules of law governing constructive notice, we think, on this record, the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of evidence on this question. All concur.


Summaries of

Adcock v. Sattler's Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 6, 1954
283 App. Div. 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Adcock v. Sattler's Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANN ADCOCK, Respondent, v. SATTLER'S INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 6, 1954

Citations

283 App. Div. 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Dykeman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

The facts of this case fall short of those in Barca. The facts here are more like those in Adcock v.…