From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Kelley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 27, 2015
NO. 5:13CV00129-SWW-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2015)

Summary

holding that even if the defendant had agreed to a plea offer, there was no showing that "the trial court would have accepted it," and consequently that the petitioner did not demonstrate prejudice

Summary of this case from Simmons v. United States

Opinion

NO. 5:13CV00129-SWW-JTR

03-27-2015

PATRICK LAVELL DAVIS ADC #104208 PETITIONER v. WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.

DATED this 27th day of March 2015.

/s/ Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Kelley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 27, 2015
NO. 5:13CV00129-SWW-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2015)

holding that even if the defendant had agreed to a plea offer, there was no showing that "the trial court would have accepted it," and consequently that the petitioner did not demonstrate prejudice

Summary of this case from Simmons v. United States
Case details for

Davis v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK LAVELL DAVIS ADC #104208 PETITIONER v. WENDY KELLEY, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

NO. 5:13CV00129-SWW-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

Sund v. Young

In considering whether an ineffective assistance claim is substantial, district courts have evaluated the…

Simmons v. United States

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(5) (describing procedure to be followed when court rejects a plea agreement under…