From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 6, 2018
4:18cv00168-JLH (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2018)

Opinion

4:18cv00168-JLH

07-06-2018

RICHARD PATRICK HORTON ADC #83175 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN DOE, Transport Deputy, Pulaski County DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith.

DATED this 6th day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

J. LEON HOLMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Horton v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 6, 2018
4:18cv00168-JLH (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Horton v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD PATRICK HORTON ADC #83175 PLAINTIFF v. JOHN DOE, Transport Deputy…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

4:18cv00168-JLH (E.D. Ark. Jul. 6, 2018)

Citing Cases

Horton v. Transp. Deputy Simer

That case was dismissed at the screening stage on July 6, 2018. Horton v. Doe, No. 4:18-cv-00168 (E.D. Ark.…