From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Powers v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2015
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00019 DPM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00019 DPM/BD

06-01-2015

THOMAS W. POWERS ADC #138358 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS


RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION I. Procedures for Filing Objections:

This Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to United States District Judge D.P. Marshall Jr. Any party may file written objections to this Recommendation. If objections are filed, they must be specific and must include the factual or legal basis for the objection. Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk within fourteen (14) days of this Recommendation.

If no objections are filed, Judge Marshall can adopt this Recommendation without independently reviewing the record. By not objecting, you may also waive any right to appeal questions of fact. II. Discussion:

Thomas Powers, an Arkansas Department of Correction ("ADC") inmate, filed this lawsuit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated while he was housed at the East Arkansas Regional Unit of the ADC. Mr. Powers alleges that Defendant Parsons failed to properly secure an extension ladder that fell on him and injured his arm and leg. (Docket entry #2)

This Court previously recommended that Mr. Powers's claims against the Defendants in their official capacities be DISMISSED, with prejudice; that claims against Defendants Hobbs, Burl, and Dover be DISMISSED, without prejudice; and that he be allowed to proceed on his claims against Defendant Parsons in his individual capacity. (#18)

Mr. Powers has filed an objection to that recommendation. (#26) --------

Defendant Parsons, however, has never been served with the complaint and summons, despite two attempts. (#8, #16) On April 1, 2015, the Court gave Mr. Powers additional time to provide a valid service address for Defendant Parsons (#17), but to date, Mr. Powers has not done so. The time for serving Defendant Parsons has now passed. III. Conclusion:

The Court recommends that Mr. Powers's claims against Defendant Parsons be DISMISSED, this 1st day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Powers v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 1, 2015
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00019 DPM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Powers v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS W. POWERS ADC #138358 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 1, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00019 DPM/BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 1, 2015)