From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Odum v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 20, 2015
No. 5:13-cv-241-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 5:13-cv-241-DPM

03-20-2015

JASON ODUM ADC #134272 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC; JIMMY BANKS, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; JOE PAGE, III, Assistant Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; CURTIS MEINZER, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit, ADC; and RICHARD THROWER, Correctional Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

1. Odum's failure-to-protect claim against Hobbs, Banks, Page, and Meinzer and his retaliation claim against Hobbs are dismissed without prejudice.

2. Odum's excessive force claim against Thrower and his retaliation claim against Thrower, Banks, Page, and Meinzer are dismissed with prejudice.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

20 March 2015


Summaries of

Odum v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 20, 2015
No. 5:13-cv-241-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Odum v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JASON ODUM ADC #134272 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC; JIMMY BANKS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

No. 5:13-cv-241-DPM (E.D. Ark. Mar. 20, 2015)