From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Burl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
No. 5:16CV00327-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 5:16CV00327-JLH-JJV

03-12-2018

DEVERICK SCOTT ADC #131042 PLAINTIFF v. DANNY BURL, Warden, Tucker Max Unit; et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith.

DATED this 12th day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

J. LEON HOLMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Burl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Mar 12, 2018
No. 5:16CV00327-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Scott v. Burl

Case Details

Full title:DEVERICK SCOTT ADC #131042 PLAINTIFF v. DANNY BURL, Warden, Tucker Max…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

No. 5:16CV00327-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Mar. 12, 2018)

Citing Cases

Allen v. Emberton

It is well-established that prisoners have no constitutional right to watch television or listen to a radio.…