From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hills v. Arkansas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 29, 2015
NO: 1:15CV00006 BSM/JWC (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2015)

Opinion

NO: 1:15CV00006 BSM/JWC

04-29-2015

STELLA HILLS ADC #704612 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS, STATE OF et al. DEFENDANTS


PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INSTRUCTIONS

The following recommended disposition has been sent to Chief United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations.

Mail your objections to:

Clerk, United States District Court
Eastern District of Arkansas
600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149
Little Rock, AR 72201-3325

DISPOSITION

Plaintiff Stella Hills, a former inmate at the Arkansas Department of Correction's McPherson Unit, filed a pro se complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, on January 12, 2015. On March 26, 2015, after mail sent to Plaintiff's address of record was returned as undeliverable, the Court entered an order directing her to file a notice of her new address (docket entry #14). That same order warned Plaintiff that her failure to comply within 30 days would result in the recommended dismissal of her complaint. More than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff has not updated her address or otherwise responded to the order. Mail sent to Plaintiff's address of record continues to be returned as undeliverable (docket entries #15 & #20). A check of the Arkansas Department of Correction and Federal Bureau of Prisons revealed no matches for Plaintiff. Under these circumstances, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure respond to the Court's order. See Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order.

2. All pending motions be DENIED AS MOOT.

3. The Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

DATED this 29th day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hills v. Arkansas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION
Apr 29, 2015
NO: 1:15CV00006 BSM/JWC (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Hills v. Arkansas

Case Details

Full title:STELLA HILLS ADC #704612 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS, STATE OF et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS BATESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 29, 2015

Citations

NO: 1:15CV00006 BSM/JWC (E.D. Ark. Apr. 29, 2015)