From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamy v. Ziriakus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, O'Donnell, J. — Damages.

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant T.G.I. Friday's, Inc., contends that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff's motion seeking a lump sum payment of the periodic installments on the annuity for future damages that accrued from the date of the verdict (October 7, 1994). There is no merit to that contention. The trial court has discretion to order an immediate lump sum award to be deducted from any annuity awarded ( see, Williams v. Bright, 230 A.D.2d 548, 557, appeal dismissed 90 N.Y.2d 935). We also reject the contention that an immediate lump sum award represents a windfall for plaintiff and thus violates the statutory scheme of CPLR articles 50-A and 50-B ( see, Rohring v. City of Niagara Falls, 84 N.Y.2d 60, 69-70).


Summaries of

Adamy v. Ziriakus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 1998
254 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Adamy v. Ziriakus

Case Details

Full title:CANDICE G. ADAMY, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Young v. Tops Markets, Inc

We reject defendants' contention that the court, in calculating the present value of the annuity contract,…

Scannapieco v. City of New York

In Bermeo, the Appellate Division, First Department, relied upon its holding in the Williams case, and…