From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamson v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 9, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv225/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv225/MCR/EMT.

December 9, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 19, 2008 (Doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The habeas petition challenging the DOC's use of Form DC6-229A, the Close Management Daily Record of Segregation, to evaluate inmates' eligibility to earn incentive gain time (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adamson v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 9, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv225/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Adamson v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:R. CASPER ADAMSON, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 9, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv225/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2008)