From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamson v. City of San Francisco

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco-Oakland
Jun 19, 2014
C 13-05233 DMR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2014)

Opinion

          JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ., DEWITT M. LACY, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS, Oakland, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, LORENZO ADAMSON.

          DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney, CHERYL ADAMS, Chief Trial Deputy, WARREN METLITZKY, Deputy City Attorney, WARREN METLITZKY, Attorneys for CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GREG SUHR, in his official capacity, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, DANIEL DUDLEY and BRIAN STANSBURY, individually and in their official capacities as police officers for the CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO.


          STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO STAY PENDING LITIGATION AND ORDER ON STIPULATION

          DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

         Pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 16-2(d) of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, plaintiff Lorenzo Adamson and defendants City of San Francisco, et al, by and through their attorneys of record request the court to stay the pending litigation until the criminal case against Lorenzo Adams is resolved and, further stipulate to an order staying this litigation in advance of the case management conference scheduled for June 18, 2014. The request is based on the pendency of criminal charges against plaintiff Lorenzo Adams arising from the underlying action. The parties agree that continuing this civil matter during the pendency of the criminal case would jeopardize the criminal matter and the rights of Plaintiff Lorenzo Adams, and would further impede the conduct of discovery and preparation of this civil case for trial. The parties will promptly inform the Court upon resolution of the criminal case against Lorenzo Adams.

         Counsel have met and conferred and are available to attend a status conference should the court require a hearing or additional briefing prior to ruling on this joint request to stay the pending litigation.

         ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Adamson v. City of San Francisco

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco-Oakland
Jun 19, 2014
C 13-05233 DMR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Adamson v. City of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO ADAMSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco-Oakland

Date published: Jun 19, 2014

Citations

C 13-05233 DMR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 19, 2014)