From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-00538 BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00538 BJR

12-13-2021

SHARON ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC., a foreign corporation, ASSA ABLOY ENTRANCE SYSTEMS, INC., a foreign corporation, and CBRE GROUP, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendants.

WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN, LLP Colin Troy, WSBA No. 46197 Attorneys for Defendant Walmart Inc. FALLON McKINLEY PLLC Eden E. Goldman, WSBA #5413 Attorneys for Assa Abloy Entrance Systems RUIZ & SMART PLLC Isaac Ruiz, WSBA No. 35237 Counsel for plaintiff TYSON & MENDES LLP Nathan Furman, WSBA 32381 Attorney for CBRE Group, In


WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN, LLP

Colin Troy, WSBA No. 46197

Attorneys for Defendant Walmart Inc.

FALLON McKINLEY PLLC

Eden E. Goldman, WSBA #5413

Attorneys for Assa Abloy Entrance Systems

RUIZ & SMART PLLC

Isaac Ruiz, WSBA No. 35237

Counsel for plaintiff

TYSON & MENDES LLP

Nathan Furman, WSBA 32381

Attorney for CBRE Group, In

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND REMAINING PRE-TRIAL DATES

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein U.S. District Court Judge

I. STIPULATION

The parties in this matter stipulate and agree to move the Court for an Order continuing the trial date and remaining pre-trial deadlines. The parties agree there is a need for additional time for a number of reasons, including the following: (1) to obtain the medical records of the plaintiff, which have been ordered but believed to be subject to significant delay from the providers due to the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) to schedule plaintiff's medical review as requested by defendants; (3) to resolve pending discovery disputes; and (4) to allow time for experts to prepare reports based on a full record. The parties also anticipate that (5) additional time for trial will be required because of the addition of two defendants since this matter commenced and, therefore, ask the Court to reserve eight days for trial.

This is the first continuance of the trial date. The parties propose a trial date of August 1, 2022, and the remaining pretrial dates as follows:

Case Event

Current Deadline

New Deadline

Reports from expert witness under FRCP 2(a)(2) due

January 18, 2022

April 5, 2022

Discovery completed by

February 16, 2022

May 4, 2022

All dispositive motion must be filed by

March 17, 2022

June 2, 2022

All Motions in limine must be filed by

April 11, 2022

June 27, 2022

Joint Pretrial statement

May 2, 2022

July 18, 2022

Pretrial conference

May 2, 2022

July 18, 2022

JURY TRIAL

MAY 16, 2022

AUGUST 1, 2022

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court directs the Clerk to enter a minute order reflecting the above amended pre-trial dates.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Adams v. Walmart Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-00538 BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Adams v. Walmart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHARON ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC., a foreign corporation, ASSA…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00538 BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 13, 2021)