From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2006
No. 1:04-cv-06658-REC-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:04-cv-06658-REC-DLB-P.

February 15, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 15) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (Doc. 14)


Plaintiff, Ronald Adams ("plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On December 13, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20) days. On December 21, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted ade novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 13, 2005, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order, filed December 6, 2005, is DENIED, without prejudice, as PREMATURE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2006
No. 1:04-cv-06658-REC-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Adams v. Vazquez

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 2006

Citations

No. 1:04-cv-06658-REC-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2006)