From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Tauizon

Court of Appeals of Texas
Mar 14, 2012
No. 04-11-00574-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 04-11-00574-CV

03-14-2012

ChamPale ADAMS, Appellant v. Richard TAUIZON, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the County Court at Law No. 9, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 370658

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant's brief was due on January 30, 2012. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. We, therefore, ordered Appellant ChamPale Adams to file, on or before February 27, 2012, appellant's brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) the failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by the failure to timely file a brief. We warned that if Appellant ChamPale Adams failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant ChamPale Adams has failed to respond to our order. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant ChamPale Adams.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Adams v. Tauizon

Court of Appeals of Texas
Mar 14, 2012
No. 04-11-00574-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Adams v. Tauizon

Case Details

Full title:ChamPale ADAMS, Appellant v. Richard TAUIZON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

No. 04-11-00574-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 14, 2012)