From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
1:10-cv-01290-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)

Opinion

1:10-cv-01290-SKO (HC).

July 23, 2010


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOCUMENT # 2)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis Examination of these documents reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 23, 2010
1:10-cv-01290-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Adams v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:MARLON VINCENT ADAMS, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 23, 2010

Citations

1:10-cv-01290-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2010)