From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 23, 2005
955 So. 2d 1106 (Ala. 2005)

Summary

holding that Adams, who was 17 years old at the time of the offense, is not eligible for a sentence of death

Summary of this case from Miller v. State

Opinion

No. 1030633.

December 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Montgomery County, No. CC-97-2403, William A. Shashy, J.

Bryan A. Stevenson, Cathleen I. Price, and Gerald W. King of Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, Montgomery, for petitioner.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Tracy M. Daniel, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.


We hereby suspend the provisions of Rule 39(g) and (h), Ala. R.App. P., allowing the petitioner and the respondent to file briefs and request oral argument, and we summarily grant the writ solely to address the propriety of Renaldo Chante Adams's sentence. Adams was convicted and sentenced to death for murdering Melissa Mills during the course of a robbery, rape, and burglary. On appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Adams's conviction and his sentence of death. Adams v. State, 955 So.2d 1037 (Ala.Crim.App. 2003).

In Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005), decided after the Court of Criminal Appeals issued its decision in this case, the United States Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to execute an offender who was under the age of 18 when he or she committed the offense. The opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals states that Adams was 17 years old at the time of the offense. 955 So.2d at 1049. Nothing filed in this Court disputes that fact. Thus, it would appear that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Roper applies to Adams's sentence; therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as to Adams's sentence and remand the cause for a determination of the impact of Roper on Adams's sentence. As to all other issues raised in Adams's petition, certiorari review is denied.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED.

NABERS, C.J., and SEE, LYONS, HARWOOD, WOODALL, STUART, and BOLIN, JJ., concur.

PARKER, J., recuses himself.


Summaries of

Adams v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Dec 23, 2005
955 So. 2d 1106 (Ala. 2005)

holding that Adams, who was 17 years old at the time of the offense, is not eligible for a sentence of death

Summary of this case from Miller v. State

holding that Adams, who was 17 years old at the time of the offense, is not eligible for a sentence of death

Summary of this case from McInvale v. State

holding that Adams, who was 17 years old at the time of the offense, is not eligible for a sentence of death

Summary of this case from Gholston v. State

holding that Adams, who was 17 years old at the time of the offense, is not eligible for a sentence of death

Summary of this case from Chapman v. State

noting that "the Alabama Supreme Court has also held that Alabama's death-penalty statute is not unconstitutional because it does not assign the specific weight that the trial court is to give the jury's recommendation"

Summary of this case from Newton v. State
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Renaldo Chante ADAMS. (In re Renaldo Chante Adams v. State of…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Dec 23, 2005

Citations

955 So. 2d 1106 (Ala. 2005)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. State

Ex parte Bankhead, 585 So.2d 112, 126 (Ala.1991).’ ” ' See Saunders v. State, 10 So.3d 53, 88…

Thompson v. State

Ex parte Bankhead, 585 So.2d 112, 126 (Ala.1991).’ ” ' See Saunders v. State, 10 So.3d 53, 88…