From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 25, 2009
291 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91754.

August 25, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.

Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang and John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before KURT ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

Prior report: 238 S.W.3d 744.



ORDER


Movant, Aaron Adams, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move to suppress or objecting to the identifications of him by two witnesses.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Aug 25, 2009
291 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Aaron ADAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Aug 25, 2009

Citations

291 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)