From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 3, 2019
No. 02-18-00386-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 02-18-00386-CV No. 02-18-00387-CV No. 02-18-00388-CV

07-03-2019

RONALD ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. F17-3262-367, F17-3264-367, F18-1387-367 Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On May 31, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam Delivered: July 3, 2019


Summaries of

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 3, 2019
No. 02-18-00386-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 3, 2019

Citations

No. 02-18-00386-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)