From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 31, 2017
No. 05-16-01348-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-16-01348-CR

07-31-2017

STONEY RAY ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 32300-86

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Whitehill, and Boatright
Opinion by Justice Boatright

Stoney Ray Adams appeals his conviction, following the adjudication of his guilt, for sexual assault of a child. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt.

/Jason Boatright/

JASON BOATRIGHT

JUSTICE Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47 161348F.U05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court, Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 32300-86.
Opinion delivered by Justice Boatright. Justices Fillmore and Whitehill participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment adjudicating guilt of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered this 31st day of July, 2017.


Summaries of

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jul 31, 2017
No. 05-16-01348-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:STONEY RAY ADAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jul 31, 2017

Citations

No. 05-16-01348-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2017)