From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan 28, 2014
420 S.W.3d 666 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. ED 99693.

2014-01-28

Martyn ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Sandra Martinez. Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Sandra Martinez.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

The movant, Martyn Adams, appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court's judgment denying the movant's Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Adams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan 28, 2014
420 S.W.3d 666 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Martyn ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Jan 28, 2014

Citations

420 S.W.3d 666 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)