From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 29, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-785 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cv-785.

January 29, 2007


ORDER


On December 7, 2006, this court entered a judgment summarily dismissing this habeas corpus action under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings. Petitioner, who is not presently incarcerated, has filed an "objection" the court's judgment. Relief from judgment is available only pursuant to Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner's objection was filed outside the mandatory ten-day time limit for motions under Rule 59(e), so relief under this rule is unavailable. To the extent that petitioner's objections are intelligible, they do not allege grounds for relief under Rule 60(b). Accordingly:

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's objection (docket # 11), construed as a motion for relief from judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), be and hereby is DENIED.


Summaries of

Adams v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 29, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-785 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)
Case details for

Adams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY WAYNE ADAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cv-785 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2007)