From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Shirley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2023
1:23-cv-01100-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01100-SAB (PC)

09-20-2023

HENRY ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. HEATHER SHIRLEY, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF NO. 9)

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On August 11, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint, found no cognizable claim, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for the reasons stated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Shirley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2023
1:23-cv-01100-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Adams v. Shirley

Case Details

Full title:HENRY ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. HEATHER SHIRLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-01100-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2023)