From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Roe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2015
Case No. CV 14-607-SJO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-607-SJO(PJW)

08-04-2015

PAUL ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. B. ROE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is denied.

DATED: August 4, 2015.

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adams v. Roe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2015
Case No. CV 14-607-SJO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Adams v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. B. ROE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-607-SJO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2015)