From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Nocon

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2083 FCD EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2083 FCD EFB.

October 1, 2008


ORDER


Presently pending before this court is plaintiffs' Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena, noticed for hearing on this court's October 15, 2008 law and motion calendar. However, the discovery deadline in this case was September 8, 2008. See Amended Scheduling Order filed Aug. 12, 2008. Moreover, on September 30, 2008, the district judge denied plaintiffs' Application for an Order Shortening Time to Hear a Motion to Extend the Discovery Cut Off and Modify the Scheduling Order, without prejudice to hearing the matter pursuant to a regularly noticed motion. The district judge stated in pertinent part, "[t]o the extent that plaintiff seeks an abbreviated briefing schedule due to the scheduled hearing date on the motion to quash, plaintiff may re-notice this motion, if necessary, after the court renders its decision on the underlying motion." See Order filed Sept. 30, 2008, n. 1.

This court has no authority to consider a discovery motion after close of discovery. If plaintiffs prevail on their motion to modify the discovery deadline, they may renotice their motion before this court.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena (Dckt. No. 54) and the October 15, 2008, hearing on the motion are VACATED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Nocon

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2083 FCD EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Adams v. Nocon

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN LYNN ADAMS, ROBERT SKIPTON BARRINGTON, SR., Plaintiffs, v. DEPUTY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2083 FCD EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2008)