From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Nimrod-Cook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-3220 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-3220 JFM (HC)

10-11-2011

JIMMIE LEE ADAMS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN NIMROD-COOK, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's June 21, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ____


Summaries of

Adams v. Nimrod-Cook

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-3220 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Adams v. Nimrod-Cook

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE LEE ADAMS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN NIMROD-COOK, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-3220 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)