From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Monroe Transit Sys. 1st Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2020
CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00281 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00281

11-30-2020

STEVEN EARL ADAMS v. MONROE TRANSIT SYSTEM 1ST TRANSIT


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 25] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

To the extent that Defendants move for dismissal under Rules 12(b)(2), 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5) for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of process, and insufficiency of service of process, the motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED AS MOOT.

MONROE, Louisiana, this 30th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Adams v. Monroe Transit Sys. 1st Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Nov 30, 2020
CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00281 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Adams v. Monroe Transit Sys. 1st Transit

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN EARL ADAMS v. MONROE TRANSIT SYSTEM 1ST TRANSIT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 3:19-CV-00281 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2020)