From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Miller

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-1795 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-1795

08-23-2022

TIMOTHY J. ADAMS. Petitioner v. GEORGE MILLER, Respondent


ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

In accordance with this Court's memorandum issued this same day, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. §2244(d).
2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
4. Petitioner's motions to appoint counsel, (Doc. 23), for reprieve, (Doc. 25), for jury trial, (Doc. 26), for evidentiary hearing, (Docs. 28, 34), for temporary reprieve, (Doc. 29), to submit evidence, (Doc. 30), to submit exhibits, (Doc. 31), for appeal bond hearing, (Doc. 32), and to take deposition of Bradford County District Attorney, (Doc. 33), are DISMSSED as moot.
5. Petitioner's motion for default judgment (Doc. 35) is DENIED, as a timely response was filed by the appropriate party in this action. (See Doc. 10).


Summaries of

Adams v. Miller

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-1795 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Adams v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY J. ADAMS. Petitioner v. GEORGE MILLER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 23, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-1795 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2022)