From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Legendary Mktg.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 3, 2024
1:23-CV-6167 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-CV-6167 (LTS)

01-03-2024

TOMMY F. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. LEGENDARY MARKETING; DIR. HUMAN RESOURCES, Legendary Marketing, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

By order dated October 3, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action for the reasons set forth in that order. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action for the reasons set forth in the Court's October 3, 2023 order.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court enter a judgment dismissing this action for the reasons set forth in the Court's October 3, 2023 order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Legendary Mktg.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 3, 2024
1:23-CV-6167 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Adams v. Legendary Mktg.

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY F. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. LEGENDARY MARKETING; DIR. HUMAN RESOURCES…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 3, 2024

Citations

1:23-CV-6167 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2024)