From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Indivior Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 30, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00203 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00203

09-30-2022

MARCUS E. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. INDIVIOR INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

DREW B. TIPTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Marcus E. Adams was involved in a motorcycle accident. To control accident-related pain, Adams was prescribed, started taking, and become addicted to a series of drugs, namely Suboxone. Adams filed this products-liability action seeking monetary damages from Defendant Indivior Inc., alleging that he became addicted to Suboxone.

Pending before the Court is the September 13, 2022 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby. (Dkt. No. 39). In the M&R Magistrate Judge Libby recommends that the Court grant Indivior's Motion to Dismiss Adams' amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 33 at 1).

The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the proposed findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No Party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005).

No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS the M&R as the opinion of the Court, GRANTS Indivior's Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. No. 33), and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Indivior Inc.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 30, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00203 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Adams v. Indivior Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS E. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. INDIVIOR INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00203 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2022)