From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Apr 9, 2012
NO. 5:11-CV-436 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 5:11-CV-436 (MTT)

04-09-2012

ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS, Plaintiff v. Commissioner SAMUEL F. HART, et al., Defendants


ORDER

On November 8, 2011, this Court dismissed pro se Plaintiff ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAM'S complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 7). Plaintiff appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which dismissed the appeal as frivolous (Doc. 17).

Plaintiff has filed three post-appeal motions, all relating to the Eleventh Circuit's ruling: (1) "Motion for Reconsideration"(Doc. 18); (2) "Motion to Vacate" (Doc. 19); and (3) "Motion to Modify" (Doc. 20). Because Plaintiff's lawsuit has been dismissed and the dismissal upheld on appeal, this Court has no jurisdiction to hear Plaintiff's motions. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to TERMINATE the pending motions at Docs. 18-20.

_________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Adams v. Hart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Apr 9, 2012
NO. 5:11-CV-436 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Adams v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS, Plaintiff v. Commissioner SAMUEL F. HART, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 5:11-CV-436 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 9, 2012)