From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Hanover Foods Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-909 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-CV-909

03-31-2022

CRAIG ADAMS, Plaintiff v. HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION and JEFF WAREHIME, Defendants


ORDER

Christopher C. Conner, United States District Judge.

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of defendants' motion (Doc. 13) to dismiss, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of today's date, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 13) to dismiss is GRANTED as follows:

a. The motion is GRANTED as to Count 9, and plaintiff's claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy is DISMISSED with prejudice.

b. The motion is GRANTED as to Counts 3 through 8, and plaintiff's claims for disability discrimination, disability retaliation, and a hostile work environment due to disability are DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. Adams is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. In the absence of a timely filed amended complaint, the above-captioned action shall proceed on Counts 1 and 2.

3. Defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A) is DEFERRED for the duration of the 21-day amendment period set forth in paragraph 2 above.


Summaries of

Adams v. Hanover Foods Corp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-CV-909 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Adams v. Hanover Foods Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG ADAMS, Plaintiff v. HANOVER FOODS CORPORATION and JEFF WAREHIME…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-CV-909 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 31, 2022)