Opinion
3:21cv2567-MCR-HTC
01-10-2022
CANDIDA ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. MARY GARTH, ROBERT GARTH, and THOMAS GARTH, Defendants.
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 29, 2021 (ECF No. 3), which recommends this case be dismissed sua sponte for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, as frivolous for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. 4). Otherwise, there have been no timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted and Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis should be deemed as moot.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 3) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
(2) The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECD Doc. 4) is deemed moot.
(3) This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
(4) The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.