Adams v. Fuller

9 Citing cases

  1. Damond v. City of Rayville

    Civil Action 23-1810 (W.D. La. Mar. 22, 2024)

    ; Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022) (“[T]he medical records are replete with notes of sick calls, examinations, and diagnoses related to his ear, which further rebut his allegations of deliberate indifference.”);

  2. Jefferson v. Richland Det. Ctr.

    Civil Action 23-0598 (W.D. La. Aug. 24, 2023)

    ; Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022) (“[T]he medical records are replete with notes of sick calls, examinations, and diagnoses related to his ear, which further rebut his allegations of deliberate indifference.”).

  3. Brown v. Zordan

    Civil Action 23-1368 (W.D. La. Nov. 20, 2023)

    District courts have “wide discretion to dismiss state law claims” under Section 1367. Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022).

  4. Lightfoot v. Gilley

    Civil Action 22-1080 (W.D. La. Sep. 28, 2023)

    District courts have “wide discretion to dismiss state law claims” under Section 1367. Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022).

  5. Rodriguez v. Killam

    Civil Action 3:23-CV-139-L-BK (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)

    District courts have “wide discretion to dismiss state law claims” under Section 1367. Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022). Here, no scheduling order has been entered, and no discovery has taken place.

  6. Bonner v. Mitchell

    Civil Action 23-0872 (W.D. La. Sep. 7, 2023)

    (“While Vessell argues that he continued to experience pain and swelling, Myles's unsuccessful treatment and Vessell's disagreement with the treatment are insufficient to demonstrate deliberate indifference.”); Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022) (“[T]he medical records are replete with notes of sick calls, examinations, and diagnoses related to his ear, which further rebut his allegations of deliberate indifference.”); Gibson v. Collier, 920 F.3d 212, 220 (5th Cir. 2019) (“There is no . . . claim just because an inmate believes that medical personnel should have attempted different diagnostic measures or alternative methods of treatment.”)

  7. King v. St Tammany Par. Prison

    Civil Action 22-6198 (W.D. La. Feb. 28, 2023)

    . District courts have “wide discretion to dismiss state law claims” under Section 1367. Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at * 1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022). Under the interests of economy, convenience, fairness, and comity, the Court should dismiss without prejudice any remaining state law claims.

  8. Nevis v. Bowan

    Civil Action 22-5986 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, 2023)

    See Petzold v. Rostollan, 946 F.3d 242, 250 (5th Cir. 2019) (“[B]ecause medical treatment was provided, even if it was . . . based on a perfunctory and inadequate evaluation, it was not denied.”); Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022) (“[T]he medical records are replete with notes of sick calls, examinations, and diagnoses related to his ear, which further rebut his allegations of deliberate indifference.”); Gibson v. Collier, 920 F.3d 212, 220 (5th Cir. 2019)

  9. Jones v. Caddo Corr. Ctr. Med. Dep't

    Civil Action 22-5621 (W.D. La. Dec. 6, 2022)

    See Petzold v. Rostollan, 946 F.3d 242, 250 (5th Cir. 2019) (“[B]ecause medical treatment was provided, even if it was . . . based on a perfunctory and inadequate evaluation, it was not denied.”); Adams v. Fuller, 2022 WL 17250191, at *1 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2022) (“[T]he medical records are replete with notes of sick calls, examinations, and diagnoses related to his ear, which further rebut his allegations of deliberate indifference.”)