From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 31, 2012
Civil Action: 11-cv-02333-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action: 11-cv-02333-LTB-CBS

07-31-2012

LaFaye Adams Plaintiff, v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Defendants.

Counsel: Pro Se Mark Thomas Clouatre Thomas Eilif Miller Werge


Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Counsel:

Pro Se

Mark Thomas Clouatre

Thomas Eilif Miller Werge

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: MOTION HEARING

Court in Session: 10:47 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Ms. LaFaye Adams appears as pro se.

The court addresses the parties regarding the Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike Defendant's Untimely Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (re: #26 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint) (Docket NO. 29, filed on 6/22/2012), the plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment Against Separate Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Docket No. 30, filed on 6/22/2012), and the defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #23 Amended Complaint (Docket No. 33, filed on 6/29/2012).

Ms. Adams presents oral argument. Ms. Adams cites case law. Discussion between the court and Ms. Adams regarding Rule 12 (a defendant must either file an answer or file a motion to dismiss), Rule 12(a)(1), Rule 12(b), Rule 15(a) pertaining to responding to the complaint, and Rule 15(a)(3).

For reasons as stated on the record,

ORDERED: The court DENIES the Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike Defendant's Untimely Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (re: #26 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint) (Docket NO. 29, filed on 6/22/2012).

Discussion between the court and Ms. Adams regarding Rule 55 pertaining to entering a default judgment.

For reasons as stated on the record,

ORDERED: The court DENIES the plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment Against Separate Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (Docket No. 30, filed on 6/22/2012). The court DENIES the defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #23 Amended Complaint (Docket No. 33, filed on 6/29/2012).

The court addresses the parties regarding the defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 26, filed on 6/21/2012) and the deadline for the plaintiff to file her response to this motion (August 7, 2012).

Discussion between the court and Ms. Adams regarding why this hearing today was set and the defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 26, filed on 6/21/2012) . Ms. Adams makes an oral motion to extend the deadline to file her response to the motion. No objection from defense counsel. The court grants the plaintiff's oral motion.

ORDERED: The plaintiff shall file her response to the defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 26, filed on 6/21/2012) no later than August 21, 2012.

11:40 a.m. Off record discussion with parties.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 11:44 a.m.

Total time in court: 00:57

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Adams v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 31, 2012
Civil Action: 11-cv-02333-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Adams v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LaFaye Adams Plaintiff, v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

Civil Action: 11-cv-02333-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Jul. 31, 2012)