Opinion
2:11-cv-00826-GEB-CKD
01-26-2012
TYRONE ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES L. EASLEY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff requests reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's January 4, 2012 Order, which denied Plaintiff's motions filed December 30, 2011 (ECF Nos. 78-81) and limited Plaintiff's future filings to the following documents:
a. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as such);(ECF No. 87.)
b. Only one motion pending at any time. Such motion must be properly noticed for hearing. Plaintiff is limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and
c. One set of objections to any findings and recommendations.
Pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 303(f) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a Magistrate Judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous" or "contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that Plaintiff has not shown the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, Plaintiff's request for reconsideration is DENIED.
_________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge