From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Easley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0826 GEB CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0826 GEB CKD PS

01-05-2012

TYRONE ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES EASLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On December 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed as to the non-appearing defendants.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Adams v. Easley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-11-0826 GEB CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Adams v. Easley

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES EASLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0826 GEB CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)