From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. DeWine

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 18, 2022
166 Ohio St. 3d 1431 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

2021-1428

03-18-2022

ADAMS v. DEWINE



CASE ANNOUNCEMENT

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

On complaint invoking this court's original jurisdiction pursuant to Article XIX, Section 3 of the Ohio Constitution. Petitioners' motion to enforce court's order denied as procedurally improper. This court entered final judgment in this case on January 14, 2022, and did not retain jurisdiction to review any plan passed or adopted under Article XIX, Section 3(A) or 3(B) of the Ohio Constitution. Petitioners may not, through a motion to enforce, challenge the validity of the congressional redistricting plan adopted on March 2, 2022.

Petitioners' motion for leave to file amended complaint denied. The motion seeks to add new claims that arose after this court's final judgment on January 14, 2022.

Nothing in this order shall be construed as precluding the filing of a new original action challenging the validity of the March 2, 2022 plan under Article XIX, Section 3(A) of the Ohio Constitution.

Kennedy, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur in the dismissal and would deny as moot the motion for leave to file amended complaint.


Summaries of

Adams v. DeWine

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 18, 2022
166 Ohio St. 3d 1431 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

Adams v. DeWine

Case Details

Full title:ADAMS v. DEWINE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

166 Ohio St. 3d 1431 (Ohio 2022)
184 N.E.3d 111

Citing Cases

Neiman v. LaRose

We also denied the motions for leave because the petitioners had improperly sought to add new claims that…

Neiman v. LaRose

We also denied the motions for leave because the petitioners had improperly sought to add new claims that…