Opinion
CA 05-02165.
Decided March 17, 2006.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Joseph W. Latham, A.J.), entered February 7, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendant Craig Danzig.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Before: PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., GORSKI, MARTOCHE, SMITH, AND HAYES, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.