From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Dahl

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 26, 2021
1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC)

08-26-2021

PAUL ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. DAHL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND REQUESTS FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

(Docs. 18, 19, 20)

Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed requests for entry of default and default judgment. (Docs. 18, 19, 20.) On August 6, 2021, the Court granted Defendants an extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before October 8, 2021. (Doc. 18.) Although Defendants' motion was filed ex parte, the order was served on Plaintiff by mail. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's requests for entry of default and default judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Adams v. Dahl

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 26, 2021
1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Adams v. Dahl

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. DAHL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00852-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2021)