From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 25, 2022
No. 1801-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

1801-21S

01-25-2022

Brandy Sabatini Adams & Simon Thomas Adams, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Diana L. Leyden Special Trial Judge

On December 29, 2021, respondent's counsel, Thomas R. Mackinson, filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (motion). Petitioners' views on the granting of the motion were unknown. By Order served December 30, 2021, the Court directed petitioners, on or before January 18, 2022, to file an objection or other response to respondent's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel.

On January 19, 2022, petitioners filed a Response to Motion to Withdraw as Counsel indicating petitioners have no objection to respondent's motion. For cause, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced motion is granted, and Thomas R. Mackinson is withdrawn as counsel for respondent.


Summaries of

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 25, 2022
No. 1801-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Adams v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Brandy Sabatini Adams & Simon Thomas Adams, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

No. 1801-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 25, 2022)